Litigaship Series

Litigaship Series: Joinder of Parties

🏽‍LITIGASHIP SERIES

Effect of mis-joinder or non-joinder of parties to an action

In any action, be it civil or criminal, one of the germane preliminary considerations to be made by the instituting party is to know the person(s) to sue.

It is unarguably the duty of the plaintiff to bring to court any party whose presence is crucial to the resolution of his case because only him can decide on the person he believes he has a relief against.

To this end, in a situation where a the plaintiff does not join the necessary party or a party who is ordinarily not supposed to be sued is joined as a party, the effect of this on such plaintiff is as captured in the pronouncement of the Court below:

It is trite law that where there has been a non-joinder either by failure of the parties or an intervener to apply for such joinder or failure of the court to join suo motu, the non-joinder will not be taken as a ground for defeating the action.

SIAX NIGERIA LIMITED & ORS v. MIGFO NIGERIA LIMITED & ANOR (2015) AELR 6513 (CA)

Keep following ●Litigaship Tower 🗼 on our website at:
https://www.lawaxis360degree.com for more series and commentaries.

Toheeb Adeagbo
Editor, Litigaship Tower

Powered by Law Axis 360°

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.